To further examine whether Gal-1–induced HepG2 cell polarization affects the structural and/or functional integrity of BC, we evaluated the immunolocalization of MDR1 and MRP2 on cells cultured for 48 hours in the absence or presence of rGal-1. Both MDR1 and MRP2 localized exclusively to the apical membrane surface, indicating that sorting and transport of MDR1 and MRP2 toward the apical membrane operates properly even in the presence of rGal-1 stimulation (Fig. 6A). Expression levels of these canalicular proteins were not altered by rGal-1 (Supporting Information Fig. 2A). Furthermore, when we double-stained
Gal-1–treated cells for Rapamycin in vivo MRP2 and actin, the structures stained with TRITC-phalloidin
were also immunostained for MRP2 (Fig. 6B), indicating that Gal-1 promotes the polarized phenotype through the formation of apical lumens. To evaluate the functional integrity of BC in rGal-1–treated cells, MRP2 secretory function was further examined. Both the transfer and secretion of glutathione methylfluorescein occurred in the presence of rGal-1 (Fig. 6B) at the same levels as in control cells (Supporting Information Fig. 2C). Therefore, Gal-1 can accelerate HepG2 cell polarization while maintaining BC structure and functional integrity. To examine the signaling pathways triggered by Gal-1 in HepG2 cells during polarization, compound screening assay we exposed cells to rGal-1 in the presence of specific pharmacological inhibitors. Interestingly, in the presence of wortmmanin or PD98059, rGal-1 effects were significantly attenuated compared with control values after 48 hours (Fig. 7A), suggesting involvement of PI3K and ERK1/2-mediated signaling pathways in this galectin effects. Because activation of PKA has been also implicated in the biogenesis of the BC,20, 21 we next explored whether this pathway was also involved in Gal-1–mediated enhancement of BC formation. When HepG2 cells were cultured in the presence 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 of both H89 and rGal-1, development of BC was significantly reduced compared with HepG2 cells cultured in the presence of Gal-1 alone (Fig. 7A). These results indicate
that Gal-1 promotes HepG2 cell polarization through PI3K, ERK1/2 MAPK, and/or PKA signaling pathways. To further confirm signaling pathways activation in HepG2 cells, we finally assessed ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 7B). When cells were incubated in serum-free medium in the presence of soluble rGal-1 for 1 minute, a rapid ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed, which was sustained up to 5 minutes and declined after 10 minutes of rGal-1 exposure. However, no Akt phosphorylation was detected in cells treated with rGal-1 for up to 60 minutes of incubation (Fig. 7B).Therefore, Gal-1 triggers HepG2 cell adhesion and polarization through activation of upstream signaling pathways involving PI3K, MEK ERK1/2, and PKA.