8% ± 0.9%, D 3.8% ± 0.9%; temperature: wild-type L 36.13°C ± 0.02°C, D 37.44°C ± 0.10°C; Sox14gfp/gfp L 37.17°C ± 0.41°C, D 36.86°C ± 0.23°C; average ± Wnt inhibitor SEM). The onset of motor activity
and feeding in Sox14gfp/gfp mice is variable and fragmented; we therefore looked at the sharper onset in the period for core body temperature rhythm to measure the phase advance in the circadian rhythm of Sox14gfp/gfp mice (wild-type zeitgeber time [ZT] 11.8 [−0.2 hr advance], Sox14gfp/gfp ZT 9.3 [−2.7 hr advance]; median) ( Figure 7J). Overall motor activity is increased in Sox14gfp/gfp mice (approximately 2.5-fold), while there was no significant difference in either total length of feeding episodes (cumulative minutes per day: wild-type: 150.6 ± 10.0, Sox14gfp/gfp: 168.2 ± 5.9; average ± SEM) or average core body temperature (wild-type: 36.7°C ± 0.06°C, Sox14gfp/gfp: 36.9°C ± 0.2°C; average ± SEM). Notably, mutant mice display bouts of strong motor activity consistently localized around the time
of D to L transition. Yet, this increased activity is transient and does not change the otherwise independent onset of the 24 hr cycle. An important function of ipRGCs is to control the light-dependent suppression of motor activity (negative masking). In this behavioral response, mice in their active phase (during the dark period) display an almost immediate cessation of movement when exposed to bright light. Activity starts again as soon as darkness is reestablished. We used the light paradigm illustrated in Figure 8A, with aL stimulation starting 1 hr into the subjective night (ZT 13) and check details maintained for the following 2 hr. While control mice had an almost immediate cessation of movement upon aL stimulation, Sox14gfp/gfp mice maintained their activity levels almost unchanged throughout the 2 hr light pulse
(percentage of prepulse activity: wild-type: 12.8% ± 3.1%; Sox14gfp/gfp: DNA ligase 95.2% ± 14.8%; average ± SEM) ( Figure 8B). A peculiarity of Sox14gfp/gfp mice is the short-lasting increase in motor activity at each light transition (L to D and D to L). This is particularly evident in the aL stimulation but is also consistently displayed in the circadian recordings under LD conditions for motor activity and for core body temperature ( Figures 7E, 7I, S5A, and S5B). Induction of the PLR completes the set of most studied responses initiated by ipRGCs. We therefore set out to measure the PLR in Sox14gfp/gfp mice. In agreement with the lack of any observable anatomical and neurotransmitter phenotype in the OPN of the Sox14gfp/gfp mice, we find that, under the conditions tested, the PLR is unaffected (pupil contraction as percentage of prepulse area: wild-type 82.2% ± 2.8%; Sox14gfp/gfp 82.4% ± 2.7%; average ± SEM) ( Figure S4). In summary, our analysis of circadian outputs and light-dependent physiological responses indicates that Sox14gfp/gfp mice retain the ability to produce an endogenous rhythm (i.e.