Instead,

they still persisted with a dolichofacial patter

Instead,

they still persisted with a dolichofacial pattern when compared with nasal breathers. “
“International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 458–465 Aim.  To compare subjective symptoms among three diagnostic subgroups of young patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Design.  We comprehensively examined 121 patients with TMDs (age ≤20 years; 90 female patients and 31 male patients) who completed self-reported forms for assessing subjective symptoms, which consisted of five items on pain intensity in the orofacial region and six items on the level of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL) (rating scale, 0–10). They were divided into three diagnostic subgroups: temporomandibular see more joint (TMJ) problem (JT) group, masticatory muscle pain (MM)

group, and the group with a combination of TMJ problems and masticatory muscle pain (JM group). Their symptoms were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests. Results.  The intensity of jaw or face tightness and difficulty in talking and yawning were not significantly different among the groups. However, the MM and JM selleck inhibitor groups had a significantly higher rating for jaw or face pain, headache, neck pain, tooth pain, and difficulty in eating soft foods (P < 0.01). Conclusions.  Young patients with MM or JM report more intense pain in the orofacial region and have more difficulties in ADL than those with JT problems alone. "
“Trauma to primary teeth may have consequences. Cobimetinib To study frequency of enamel defects

in permanent successors after luxation injuries, and to report carers’ experiences. Children 8–15 years (n = 170) suffering luxation injury to primary dentition in 2003 were reexamined in 2010. Permanent successors (n = 300) were clinically examined and photographed. Data from dental records, registration form and a questionnaire were analysed by cross-tabulation and tested by chi-square and t-test. Enamel defects were registered in 130 successor teeth, 22% due to trauma, 21% due to other aetiological factors (MIH, dental fluorosis, idiopathic). Successors with enamel defects were after concussion 8%, subluxation 18%, lateral luxation 41%, intrusion 38% and avulsion 47%. Enamel defects were associated with the child’s age and severity of the injury (P < 0.05). Six children had enamel defects in successors of non-injured primary teeth. Anxiety recorded by carers was associated with severity and number of injured teeth (P < 0.05). According to carers eight children developed dental fear, seven were younger than 3.5 years and had had their injured teeth removed. Minor luxation injuries and indirect trauma may cause enamel defects in permanent successors. Lower age at injury, severity and number of injured teeth affect carer and child negatively.

Comments are closed.