Values shown are mean ± SD for sextuple cultures from one experiment, representive of three independent experiments conducted. B: PcDNA3.1(IGFBP7)-RKO cells (500/well) were seeded into 0.3% Bacto-agar over a 0.6% agar bottom layer in triplicate in 6-well plates, with or without 1 μg/ml HSP60. After 3 weeks of incubation, colony number (>100 μm)were analyzed. Values are mean ± S.D for data from three

independent experiments. C: Colony size was also analyzed under microscopy. Representive size of the colony was photographed under high power microscopy (×100). Discussion Here we describe a proteomics study of two human colon cancer cell lines differing in the expression of IGFBP7, which is an important tumor suppressor gene well defined by our previous studies[7]. To our knowledge, this is the first proteomic

selleck chemicals study on the alterations of IGFBP7 EPZ5676 mouse protein expression profiles in colon cancer cells. We were successful in identifying six IGFBP7-associated downstream target proteins, including ALB, HSP60, Actin cytoplasmic Rabusertib research buy 1 or 2, PKM2, FARSB and hypothetical protein. These differentially expressed proteins represent candidate proteins that may be directly or indirectly regulated by IGFBP7. The comparation between the current findings at the translation level and our previous studies identifying the IGFBP7-induced genes at the transcriptional level detected by Affymetrix chip platform(unpublished data) resulted in some interesting points in agreement. The proteomics finding indicated that actin was influenced by IGFBP7. While the cDNA array studies also indicated that the actin binding proteins were greatly influenced by IGFBP7. These findings at both the transcriptional and the translational level suggested that IGFBP7 may possibly be an actin-binding associated gene, which need our further study to provide the direct evidence. However, there is little overlap of identified genes between our mRNA and protein data, consistent with the data reviewed by Sagynaliev and the colleagues that

among various gene expression studies only about 25% of differentially expressed proteins PIK3C2G were reflected by concomitant changes at the mRNA level in CRC [18]. This may be due to two reasons. First, the lower dynamic range of the 2D PAGE protocol allows less abundant proteins to escape detection [19]. With only around 1100 protein spots visible, this approach allows the analysis of only a fraction of the total number of proteins expressed in the cell. Second, from the transcriptional profiles, we found that IGFBP7 could influence the expression levels of many secretary genes. However, many of them could not be detected by the current proteomics approach in the cell lysates samples. Secretome studies performed in the supermedium of the cells will probably enlarge our finding [20]. Among the differentially expressed proteins induced by IGFBP7, HSP60 attracted our attention.