The task consisted of habituation, training and testing sessions, each of them lasting 8 min. In the first session, BGB324 concentration mice were habituated to the behavioral apparatus, with no objects, and then returned to their home cages. Twenty-four hours later, training session took place, when animals were exposed to two equal objects (object A), and the exploration time was recorded with two stopwatches. Exploration was recorded when the animal touched or reached the object with the nose at a distance of less than 2 cm. Climbing or sitting on the object was not considered exploration. Immediately after training the animals received the following drug

treatments: Tx3-1, 4-AP or vehicle. The test session was carried out 2 (short-term memory) or 24 (long-term memory) hours after training,

when mice were placed back in the behavioral chamber and one of the familiar objects (i.e. object A) was replaced by a novel object (i.e. object B). The time spent exploring the familiar and the novel object was recorded. The discrimination index was then calculated, taking into account the difference of time spent exploring the new and familiar objects ([(Tnovel – Tfamiliar)/(Tnovel + Tfamiliar)] × 100 (%)), and used as a memory parameter. Aiming to identify any abnormal behavior that might arise from central administration of Tx3-1 or 4-AP, we qualitatively monitored gross behavior of treated mice, such as convulsions, coordination problems, muscular

weakness and paralysis (Dalmolin et al., 2011). Statistical Selleck Ku 0059436 analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism Version 5.01. Values are given as mean + S.E.M. χ2 test, one-way, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) post hoc test, depending on the experiment. When possible, the effective dose 50% (ED50) values were calculated by nonlinear regression using a Adenylyl cyclase dose–response equation adjusted to provide the best description of the values of the individual experiments. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. In order to evaluate the effect of Tx3-1 on short-term and long-term memory of naive mice, animals were injected with Tx3-1 immediately after training session and tested two or twenty-four hours afterward in the novel object recognition task. We found no significant difference in the amount of time animals of all groups spent exploring both the objects in the training session, indicating no biased exploration of the objects (data not shown). Administration of Tx3-1 (i.c.v., 300 pmol/site) in naive mice significantly increased the discrimination index for the novel object when compared to vehicle group, both for short-term memory (One-way ANOVA, F(4,27) = 3.552, p = 0.0188 Fig. 1A) and long-term memory (One-way ANOVA, F(4,45) = 4.265, p = 0.0052 Fig. 1B). Administration of Tx3-1 (i.c.v., 10–300 pmol/site) induced no visible adverse-effects in any dose tested ( Table 1).