The most common way to compare models against data is to compare

The most common way to compare models against data is to compare state variables independently. By definition, the correlation is about relationships and therefore the present effort provides a relatively novel approach to testing models against observations. The objective of the present effort is to develop and assess the physical reasonableness of a performance

metric based on the correlation between 2 and 6 day band pass filtered wind stress and sea surface temperature. An important part of this exercise is incorporating into our metric the knowledge we have about uncertainties affecting model-data comparison, such as the uncertainties in wind forcing. While we strive to understand how particular KPP parameters affect this correlation, our goal is not to derive new physical insights into boundary layer mixing. Rather we wish to know whether the CP-868596 nmr Selumetinib purchase metric provides a fair comparison between observations and model simulations and whether there is sufficient sensitivity of the metric to model parameters to make it a useful Bayesian parameter “calibration.

The KPP mediates turbulent mixing on a variety of time scales and in response to different types of forcing. A boundary layer depth is diagnosed, above and below which the turbulent fluxes have different parameterizations. The model physics distinguish between two types of turbulence in the boundary layer: Methocarbamol convective (or density-driven) turbulence, and velocity shear-driven turbulence. Convective turbulence occurs when the boundary layer is unstably stratified, often due to heat flux from the ocean surface

to the atmosphere by longwave radiative cooling or by evaporation at the surface. Shear-driven turbulence results when the shear in the horizontal velocity ∂U∂Z is sufficiently strong to cause an overturning of the stably stratified water column. Below the thermocline, shear instabilities can also result in enhanced turbulent fluxes, having the effect of smoothing out the vertical property profiles. Because vertical turbulence occurs on length and time scales too small (0.1–10 m) (Large and Gent, 1999) to be resolved in a model, the KPP uses coarser scale input and simulates the net effects of turbulence in diffusing momentum, heat, and, salinity. Though small in scale, the net impact of turbulence is important in determining the properties of the ocean boundary layer. This is especially true near the equator (Large and Gent, 1999), where the trade winds force an adjusted current that follows the direction of the wind, and there is an oppositely directed return flow at depth (the Equatorial Undercurrent). Between these layers is a highly sheared site that can mix turbulently when there are fluctuations in the wind forcing.

Comments are closed.