The Curie temperatures of the LSMO nanolayers with and PLX-4720 purchase without In2O3 epitaxial buffering were 290 and 323K, respectively. A higher ferromagnetic ordering degree causes the LSMO films to have a higher saturation magnetization value and Curie temperature [16]. This reveals that more structural inhomogeneities in the LSMO nanolayer with In2O3

epitaxial buffering caused the double-exchange mechanism to have a greater depression degree [17]. Moreover, the higher moment in manganite thin films was attributed to a lower resistivity of the film [18]. This is in agreement with the CAFM measurements that convey that the LSMO nanolayer with In2O3 epitaxial buffering is slightly more resistant than the film without buffering. There www.selleckchem.com/products/cobimetinib-gdc-0973-rg7420.html is a large difference in the ZFC and FC curves’ low temperature range. ZFC curves display a broad summit peak. A larger difference in magnetization between the ZFC and FC curves in the low temperature region was observed for the LSMO nanolayer with In2O3 epitaxial buffering, which conveyed that randomly oriented magnetic domains are more difficult to align in the film. The subgrain boundaries among the LSMO nanograins, rough film surfaces, and interfaces caused an existence of disordered spins in the LSMO nanolayer. These disordered spins might play an important role in separating the magnetically ordered regions in the LSMO nanolayer [19]. This

caused the marked cluster glass state in the film. Figure 5c,d shows the magnetization-field (M-H) hysteresis curves at 50 K for LSMO nanolayers with and without In2O3 epitaxial buffering. selleck screening library The field was applied parallel to the

substrates. The respective in-plane saturated magnetization value was approximately 500 and 625 emu/cm3 for the LSMO nanolayers with and without In2O3 epitaxial buffering, respectively. The LSMO nanolayers with and without In2O3 epitaxial buffering have coercive fields that are 90 and 72 Oe, respectively. The crystal imperfections, such as surface roughness, subgrain boundary, and heterointerface, play important roles in determining the coercivity [7]. Several results conveyed that the surface roughness provides an extra hindrance to the magnetization reversal and induces an increase in coercivity accordingly Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin [20]. Moreover, a greater degree of structural inhomogeneities (rugged heterointerfaces and subgrain boundaries) in the LSMO nanolayer with In2O3 epitaxial buffering act as domain-wall pinning centers [17]. The relatively low coercivity is attributed to the high quality, low defect density of the LSMO nanolayer without buffering. The structural analyses support the observed M-H results. Figure 5 FC and ZFC M – T curves. Field-cooled and zero-field-cooled M-T curves of the LSMO nanolayer (a) with and (b) without In2O3 epitaxial buffering. M-H curve of the LSMO nanolayer (c) with and (d) without In2O3 epitaxial buffering.