cholerae T6SS. The protein stability assay utilizing chloramphenicol to stop de novo protein synthesis revealed that VipB was very rapidly

degraded in the absence of VipA. This indicates that VipB degradation may be a potent mechanism used by T6SS-containing bacteria to regulate the activity of the secretion system in response to distinct environmental stimuli. In further support of an important role of environmental stimuli for the VipA-VipB interaction and thereby control of T6S, we observed that a high concentration of salt appeared PND-1186 chemical structure beneficial for the stability of the complex. High salt (340 mM) is also an important trigger for the activity of the T6SS of V. cholerae O1 strain A1552 [13], which is a concentration not far from that found in the normal ocean habitat of Vibrio, i.e. around 500 mM. Overall, the results on the VipA-VipB interaction agreed between the Sotrastaurin in vivo B2H and Y2H methods. The multiple alanine substitution mutants that failed to interact with

VipB, or exhibited intermediate binding, showed unstable expression of VipB in click here V. cholerae and E. coli, indicating a lack of proper interaction with the latter. Importantly, the failure to interact was not due to protein instability, since the mutant alleles were shown to be expressed at wild-type levels in V. cholerae as well as in the E. coli B2H system. The exact role of the VipA/VipB complex is still elusive, but our data indicate that the functional VipA/VipB complex is a prerequisite for the normal function of the T6SS. It has been suggested to guide effector proteins to the secretion channel, analogous to what has been suggested for chaperones of type III secretion systems [28, 29]. However, a study why aimed to elucidate the essential function of ClpV for T6S, identified a direct interaction with VipB and revealed a remodeling of the VipA/VipB complex

upon interaction with ClpV [9]. The complex alone appeared as large, tubular, cogwheel-like structures but these were dissolved when interacting with ClpV into small complexes. Moreover, no direct interaction was observed between the VipA/VipB complex and the secreted substrates Hcp or VgrG2. Thus, these findings suggest that the complex does not direct the secretory proteins for export, but instead it was proposed that the ClpV-mediated remodeling of VipA/VipB controls the dynamics of VipA/VipB tubules by regulating the number and size of the complexes and ultimately the activity of the T6S apparatus [9]. A follow-up study utilized an immobilized library of 15-mer peptides of VipA and VipB to identify the binding site between the N-terminus of ClpV and VipA/VipB [10]. While no VipA binding was identified by this approach, a few VipB peptides appeared to interact and two located in the N-terminus of VipB were subjected to further analysis.