cDNAs from total RNA were prepared with the ImProm-II™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed using specific primers for the selected genes, and mRNA expression

was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). PCR products were analyzed on 1% agarose gels visualized with ethidium bromide. All experiments were performed at least three times. The data shown are representative results of the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Differences were judged to be statistically significant when the P-value was < 0.05. We examined the hypothesis that Lactobacillus gDNA (p-gDNA) would inhibit TNF-α production based on our previous observation that Lactobacillus LTA reduces LPS-induced TNF-α production. THP-1 cells pretreated with 1 and 10 μg mL−1 of p-gDNA or S. aureus genomic DNA (a-gDNA) followed by re-stimulation with 0.5 μg mL−1 of LPS displayed significantly less check details LPS-induced TNF-α production (Fig. 1a). The inhibitory efficiency of gDNAs increased gradually with the gDNA pretreatment time (Fig. 1b). THP-1 cells treated with various concentrations of a-gDNA for 6 h showed a dose-dependent increase of TNF-α production, whereas

p-gDNA barely produced TNF-α compared to a-gDNA-treated cells (Fig. 2a). TNF-α production from THP-1 cells treated with 10 μg mL−1 of a-gDNA peaked at 6 h after stimulation and slowly decreased (Fig. 2b). As THP-1 cells are very sensitive to endotoxin, we tried to exclude GSK458 endotoxin contamination from prepared gDNA. All gDNA preparations were confirmed for the presence of endotoxin using a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay kit. Although endotoxin concentration remained below stimulatory levels (0.05 ng mL−1) throughout the study, we treated the prepared gDNA with polymyxin B before incubation with

THP-1 cells to test whether the experiments were affected by contamination. As shown in Fig. 2c, endotoxin-induced TNF-α decreased after pretreatment with 50 μg mL−1polymyxin B, but p-gDNA- or a-gDNA-mediated TNF-α production was not affected by polymyxin B, demonstrating that the media and gDNAs were not contaminated with endotoxin. To confirm whether gDNA can induce selleck inhibitor TNF-α production from THP-1 cells, prepared gDNA was treated with DNase. Control aDNA induced TNF-α but DNase-treated aDNA did not. p-gDNA modestly induced TNF-α production in both the DNase treated and untreated tests (Fig. 2d). In another experiment, DNase treatment of gDNA significantly inhibited DNA-mediated tolerance, further confirming that gDNA is responsible for the induction of TNF-α and the inhibition of LPS-induced TNF-α production (Fig. 2e). To identify which signaling pathway may be involved in gDNA-mediated TNF-α production, the signaling inhibitors were treated for 30 min before ligand stimulation. p-gDNA caused low basic TNF-α expression levels that were not affected by inhibitors.