6, 8 (3) Misclassification of Klatskin tumor as ICC has been shown to result in an overestimation of the incidence of ICC and an underestimation of ECC.10 (4) Most CC studies do not distinguish site (e.g., ductal, hilar, and peripheral) or histology. Specific risk factors for different types of CC are, therefore, likely to be missed, depending on the distribution of these types in a given study. (5) In studies where the distinction between ICC and ECC was used, some potential risk factors seem to have a differential effect on CC, depending on the site. The consistent use of a more refined classification would allow a better understanding of risk factors for CC. CC is a rare malignancy in Western countries, but is more common in

Asia. This difference is mostly attributed to the higher prevalence of established risk factors, such as parasitic infections, bile-duct cysts, and hepatolithiasis. However, most cases of CC are

Nutlin-3 mouse PCI-32765 mw not associated with established risk, except in areas endemic for liver flukes. The established risk factors for CC include parasitic infections, biliary-duct cysts, hepatolithiasis, and PSC. Less-established risk factors include IBD, HCV, HBV, cirrhosis, obesity, diabetes, alcohol, smoking, and genetic polymorphisms. There are not enough consistent data to support that IBD independent of PSC, obesity, smoking, or specific genetic polymorphisms confer an increased risk for CC. Available data suggest that diabetes and heavy alcohol drinking may confer an increased risk for CC. The data also suggest that in Western countries, HCV is consistently associated with ICC and not ECC. In Asian countries, it appears that HBV may be associated with ICC. Cirrhosis is the most consistently illustrated risk factor for ICC, but not ECC. The lack of an accurate, consistent CC classification system may have hindered the conduct and interpretation of risk factors in epidemiological studies. “
“Telaprevir administered for 12 weeks in combination with pegylated interferon

(Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) substantially enhances the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.1, 2 Skin rashes and anemia are the two main side effects of telaprevir. In phase II/III clinical trials, telaprevir resulted in rash for 55% of patients who received at least one dose of telaprevir, MCE公司 6% of which had to discontinue treatment because of the severity of the skin condition.3 To date, the mechanism of skin toxicity of telaprevir is unknown. Most of the rash events with telaprevir were classified as grade 1 or 2, but few severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) have also been reported during phase II and III protocols.3 In case of grade 1 and 2 rash, telaprevir can be continued and the patient should be treated by topical steroids associated with emollients and antihistaminic drugs. A follow-up by a dermatologist is recommended for patients with a grade 2 rash.