(c) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.”
“The effectiveness of hypertension treatments is attributed either to the change in blood pressure, independent of the means used, or to an important contribution of appropriate drug selection: this debate probably stems from an inappropriate comparison.\n\nTreating essential hypertension in relatively healthy patients without advanced vascular disease and co-morbidities affords cardio-vascular protection by

the lowering of the mechanical shear stress determined by blood pressure per se: thus, lowering blood pressure is the critical step, while the methods used can only differ BMS-777607 purchase through side effects. This treatment is, in fact, a lifetime prophylaxis, as hypertension, rather than a disease, is a symptom affecting NCT-501 cost one tail of the Gaussian distribution of blood pressure across the normal population. Treating hypertension in the

context of diseases, like diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, and advanced atherosclerosis, would be improper if focused on just one symptom, while the appropriate treatment must include options which exhibit a more extended profile to include effectiveness on cardiac hypertrophy, insulin resistance, cardiac output, and systemic hemodynamics: thus, drugs may be different in their effectiveness and in the cardio-vascular protection afforded, even though the trials quoted in favour of this thesis were designed to compare drugs in their

ability to lower blood pressure rather than in improving the overall complex clinical derangements.\n\nIn conclusion, while the answer to the question is a sharp YES when dealing with primary prevention, it might be a NO, still clouded by contradictory and inconclusive evidence when dealing with BI 6727 research buy secondary prevention and/or treatment of complex disease conditions and co-morbidities. (C) 2010 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.”
“BACKGROUND: Extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass is a valuable tool in treating intracranial diseases requiring flow replacement or parent vessel sacrifice. Radial artery grafts (RAGs) and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have been used as conduits to provide adequate high flow revascularizations. It is a therapeutic challenge when these grafts are unavailable.\n\nMETHODS: All EC-IC high flow cerebral revascularizations performed using conduits other than RAGs or SVGs were identified from a prospective cerebrovascular registry. These patients were retrospectively reviewed for surgical technique, graft patency, graft flow, and clinical outcomes.\n\nRESULTS: Three patients (all women) underwent EC-IC bypass surgery using tibial artery grafts (two anterior tibial artery and one posterior tibial artery) because of the nonavailability of RAG or SVG.