\n\nObjective\n\nTo analyse patterns of concomitant allergic reactions to the five epoxy (meth)acrylates in relation to exposure.\n\nMethods\n\nWe reviewed the

1994-2008 patch test files at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) for reactions to the five epoxy (meth)acrylates, and examined the patients’ medical records for exposure.\n\nResults\n\nTwenty-four patients had an allergic reaction to at least one of the studied epoxy (meth)acrylates, but specific exposure was found only in five patients: two bis-GMA allergies from dental products, two bis-GA allergies from UV-curable printing inks, and one bis-GA allergy from an anaerobic glue. Only 25% of the patients were negative to DGEBA epoxy resin.\n\nConclusions\n\nThe great

majority of allergic patch test reactions check details to bis-GMA, bis-GA, GMA and bis-EMA were not associated with specific exposure, and cross-allergy to DGEBA epoxy resin remained a probable explanation. However, independent reactions to bis-GA indicated specific exposure. Anaerobic sealants may induce sensitization not only to aliphatic (meth)acrylates but also to aromatic bis-GA.”
“PURPOSE: To S3I-201 nmr compare refractive state changes in eyes implanted with toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) vs non-toric IOLs, after cataract extraction. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative. METHODS: In a single institution, 121 eyes underwent phacoemulsification and implantation with either nontoric IOLs or.toric IOLs. The spherical value, cylindrical value, spherical equivalent (SE) of refractive error, and visual acuity were measured preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Main outcome measures were the pattern of changes of spherical, cylindrical, and SE values based on postoperative time, between different IOL types. RESULTS: The groups, which included patients who underwent surgery with SN6OWF (Group I), SA6AT3 (Group 11-3), SA6AT4 (Group II-4), and

SA6AT5 lenses (Group 11-5), contained 37, 29, 23, and 32 eyes, respectively. The cylindrical value was significantly ATM Kinase Inhibitor purchase decreased in all groups (P smaller than .05). Before surgery, the SE of refractive errors was estimated as -0.21, -0.10, -0.20, and -0.22 in the respective groups. The actual remaining SE values were -0.19, -0.24, -0.42, and -0.56 at 1 month; -0.17, -0.26, -0.57, and -0.64 at 3 months; and -0.17, -0.26, -0.70, and -0.74 at 6 months postoperatively, respectively. The follow-up SE values in groups land 11-3 were similar (P bigger than .05 in both groups); however, significant myopic changes were observed in Groups 11-4 and II-5 after surgery, vs Group I (P smaller than .05).